<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 444 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758200</link>
    <description>HC found GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect unlawful. The order violated natural justice principles due to vague show cause notice and lack of proper hearing. Court set aside the impugned order, directed petitioner to file appeals within two weeks, and emphasized statutory remedies for challenging ITC denial and related tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 20:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 444 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758200</link>
      <description>HC found GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect unlawful. The order violated natural justice principles due to vague show cause notice and lack of proper hearing. Court set aside the impugned order, directed petitioner to file appeals within two weeks, and emphasized statutory remedies for challenging ITC denial and related tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>