https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758195 An efficacious statutory appellate remedy under the GST law barred writ interference, so the grievance regarding non-uploading of the order and alleged non-compliance with the departmental circular was left to be pursued before the appellate forum. The Court declined to entertain the writ petition on merits because the proper course was to invoke the alternate remedy. At the same time, it protected the petitioner from limitation prejudice by directing exclusion of the period spent prosecuting the writ petition while pursuing the statutory appeal. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 20:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758195 An efficacious statutory appellate remedy under the GST law barred writ interference, so the grievance regarding non-uploading of the order and alleged non-compliance with the departmental circular was left to be pursued before the appellate forum. The Court declined to entertain the writ petition on merits because the proper course was to invoke the alternate remedy. At the same time, it protected the petitioner from limitation prejudice by directing exclusion of the period spent prosecuting the writ petition while pursuing the statutory appeal. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758195