<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 428 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758184</link>
    <description>HC found merit in petitioner&#039;s tax credit challenge. The court set aside the tax order, directing respondent to reconsider the case within three months. Key issues including Input Tax Credit denial, goods purchase allegations, and creditor payment claims were reviewed. Court ordered a fresh assessment with opportunity for personal hearing, providing relief to the petitioner without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 428 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758184</link>
      <description>HC found merit in petitioner&#039;s tax credit challenge. The court set aside the tax order, directing respondent to reconsider the case within three months. Key issues including Input Tax Credit denial, goods purchase allegations, and creditor payment claims were reviewed. Court ordered a fresh assessment with opportunity for personal hearing, providing relief to the petitioner without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>