<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Referral Service&#039;s Tax Exemption Upheld: Tribunal Confirms Services as &#039;Export of Services,&#039; Dismisses Penalties and Interest.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81156</link>
    <description>The services provided by the appellant, a referral service for Canadian banks and foreign universities, were examined to determine whether they constituted &#039;Export of Services&#039; exempt from service tax or were classifiable as &#039;Intermediary Service&#039; under the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. The Tribunal relied on the Genpact case, which outlined three conditions for an &#039;Intermediary&#039;: principal-agency relationship, facilitation of service by a third party, and not performing the main service itself. The Tribunal found that in a previous case for the same services, it had held that the appellant&#039;s services did not fall under &#039;Intermediary Services&#039; and satisfied the conditions for &#039;Export of Services&#039;, hence not liable for service t.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Referral Service&#039;s Tax Exemption Upheld: Tribunal Confirms Services as &#039;Export of Services,&#039; Dismisses Penalties and Interest.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81156</link>
      <description>The services provided by the appellant, a referral service for Canadian banks and foreign universities, were examined to determine whether they constituted &#039;Export of Services&#039; exempt from service tax or were classifiable as &#039;Intermediary Service&#039; under the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. The Tribunal relied on the Genpact case, which outlined three conditions for an &#039;Intermediary&#039;: principal-agency relationship, facilitation of service by a third party, and not performing the main service itself. The Tribunal found that in a previous case for the same services, it had held that the appellant&#039;s services did not fall under &#039;Intermediary Services&#039; and satisfied the conditions for &#039;Export of Services&#039;, hence not liable for service t.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>