https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457156 The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the Competition Commission's closure of information alleging price fixation and abuse of dominant position by cab aggregators. The appellate tribunal held that the informant lacked locus standi as they failed to demonstrate any legal injury as a consumer or member of trade associations. The tribunal found no evidence of collusion among drivers through the platforms, noting drivers had no inter-connectivity and were free to accept or reject rides. The Commission's finding of no prima facie case was upheld, with the tribunal concluding the allegations lacked substance and the impugned order contained no legal infirmity. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Sep 2024 21:45:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457156 The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the Competition Commission's closure of information alleging price fixation and abuse of dominant position by cab aggregators. The appellate tribunal held that the informant lacked locus standi as they failed to demonstrate any legal injury as a consumer or member of trade associations. The tribunal found no evidence of collusion among drivers through the platforms, noting drivers had no inter-connectivity and were free to accept or reject rides. The Commission's finding of no prima facie case was upheld, with the tribunal concluding the allegations lacked substance and the impugned order contained no legal infirmity. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457156