<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457149</link>
    <description>Contempt of court arises where newspaper criticism of a judicial decision exceeds fair comment by attributing improper motives to judges, creating a risk of undermining public confidence in the administration of justice. Legitimate criticism remains permissible, but imputations that judges acted on extraneous considerations may seriously damage judicial dignity and the justice system. An unconditional apology, sincere regret, and an undertaking to give the regret wide publicity may support discontinuance of contempt proceedings. The rule issued against the editor, printer and publisher was discharged without costs after their apology was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 12:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457149</link>
      <description>Contempt of court arises where newspaper criticism of a judicial decision exceeds fair comment by attributing improper motives to judges, creating a risk of undermining public confidence in the administration of justice. Legitimate criticism remains permissible, but imputations that judges acted on extraneous considerations may seriously damage judicial dignity and the justice system. An unconditional apology, sincere regret, and an undertaking to give the regret wide publicity may support discontinuance of contempt proceedings. The rule issued against the editor, printer and publisher was discharged without costs after their apology was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>