<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457149</link>
    <description>The SC addressed contempt proceedings against a newspaper for an article criticizing the Court&#039;s decision and attributing improper motives to judges. The article was deemed contemptuous, threatening public confidence in justice. Respondents acknowledged the overstep, offered an unconditional apology, and promised to publicize their regret. Consequently, the SC accepted the apology, discharged the rule, and imposed no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 12:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457149</link>
      <description>The SC addressed contempt proceedings against a newspaper for an article criticizing the Court&#039;s decision and attributing improper motives to judges. The article was deemed contemptuous, threatening public confidence in justice. Respondents acknowledged the overstep, offered an unconditional apology, and promised to publicize their regret. Consequently, the SC accepted the apology, discharged the rule, and imposed no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>