<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 393 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758149</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax authority&#039;s order blocking Input Tax Credit (ITC). Court held petitioner failed to provide mandatory vehicle movement details under CGST Act. While acknowledging procedural concerns, HC directed petitioner to appeal before Appellate Authority within four weeks, maintaining administrative remedy process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 23:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 393 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758149</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax authority&#039;s order blocking Input Tax Credit (ITC). Court held petitioner failed to provide mandatory vehicle movement details under CGST Act. While acknowledging procedural concerns, HC directed petitioner to appeal before Appellate Authority within four weeks, maintaining administrative remedy process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>