<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1696 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457143</link>
    <description>Acceptance of a Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme application and production of the discharge certificate gave the settlement finality for the covered liability, so the pending appeals were treated as deemed withdrawn. The tribunal did not undertake a merits adjudication of the original dispute because the statutory settlement had already operated to conclude the matter. On that basis, the appeals were disposed of in terms of the Scheme and were not pursued further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1696 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457143</link>
      <description>Acceptance of a Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme application and production of the discharge certificate gave the settlement finality for the covered liability, so the pending appeals were treated as deemed withdrawn. The tribunal did not undertake a merits adjudication of the original dispute because the statutory settlement had already operated to conclude the matter. On that basis, the appeals were disposed of in terms of the Scheme and were not pursued further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>