https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758135 Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient cause under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, and cannot be used to reargue concluded merits. Applying that standard, no manifest mistake or patent error was shown in the earlier order directing supply of original non-relied documents and continuation of adjudication, so interference was unwarranted and the review petition was rejected. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758135 Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient cause under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, and cannot be used to reargue concluded merits. Applying that standard, no manifest mistake or patent error was shown in the earlier order directing supply of original non-relied documents and continuation of adjudication, so interference was unwarranted and the review petition was rejected. Case-Laws GST Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758135