<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal cannot dismiss an appeal for default and must decide it on merits; applying that Supreme Court principle, the Bombay HC treated the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order as invalid and required the appeal to be disposed of afresh on merits. The reference was not answered, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal cannot dismiss an appeal for default and must decide it on merits; applying that Supreme Court principle, the Bombay HC treated the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order as invalid and required the appeal to be disposed of afresh on merits. The reference was not answered, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>