<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 318 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses under Custom House Agent (CHA) services, as these are not taxable. Additionally, it annulled the demand on Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) commission covered by an exemption notification. The remaining demand on BAS commission was upheld, modifying the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 318 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses under Custom House Agent (CHA) services, as these are not taxable. Additionally, it annulled the demand on Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) commission covered by an exemption notification. The remaining demand on BAS commission was upheld, modifying the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>