https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457119 Competition Commission of India found prima facie evidence that Google contravened Section 4 of Competition Act, 2002 regarding abuse of dominant position. The allegations included exclusivity requirements for app payments, pre-installation of Google Pay on Android devices, search manipulation favoring Google Pay, and unfair terms imposed on users. The Commission directed DG to investigate within 60 days. The Commission clarified that the informant has no immunity from cross-examination during DG proceedings, rejecting informant's claim that Google cannot cross-examine them. en-us Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Sep 2024 20:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457119 Competition Commission of India found prima facie evidence that Google contravened Section 4 of Competition Act, 2002 regarding abuse of dominant position. The allegations included exclusivity requirements for app payments, pre-installation of Google Pay on Android devices, search manipulation favoring Google Pay, and unfair terms imposed on users. The Commission directed DG to investigate within 60 days. The Commission clarified that the informant has no immunity from cross-examination during DG proceedings, rejecting informant's claim that Google cannot cross-examine them. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457119