https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457130 A direction requiring written communication of grounds of arrest was treated as prospective because the Supreme Court used the word "henceforth"; it was not applied to invalidate an arrest already made under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, especially where the remand papers contained the grounds of arrest. The Court also held that the rigors of Section 45 were not attracted on the facts, noting that the petitioner was not named in earlier prosecution complaints and that the FIR relied on did not directly bear on the money-laundering allegation. Bail was therefore granted and custody ordered to terminate on bail. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Sep 2024 20:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457130 A direction requiring written communication of grounds of arrest was treated as prospective because the Supreme Court used the word "henceforth"; it was not applied to invalidate an arrest already made under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, especially where the remand papers contained the grounds of arrest. The Court also held that the rigors of Section 45 were not attracted on the facts, noting that the petitioner was not named in earlier prosecution complaints and that the FIR relied on did not directly bear on the money-laundering allegation. Bail was therefore granted and custody ordered to terminate on bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457130