<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38144</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 1972-73. The court found indications of non-disclosure of material facts related to a loan transaction, supported by a subsequent voluntary disclosure by a company director. Despite arguments regarding the director&#039;s actions not binding the company, the court emphasized the need for complete disclosure before issuing a reopening notice. The challenge to the notice was dismissed, with the court citing sufficient grounds to suspect non-disclosure, and no alternative remedies were explored for the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38144</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 1972-73. The court found indications of non-disclosure of material facts related to a loan transaction, supported by a subsequent voluntary disclosure by a company director. Despite arguments regarding the director&#039;s actions not binding the company, the court emphasized the need for complete disclosure before issuing a reopening notice. The challenge to the notice was dismissed, with the court citing sufficient grounds to suspect non-disclosure, and no alternative remedies were explored for the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>