<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1246 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457116</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a review DPC must be convened to reconsider the respondent&#039;s promotion retrospectively from when his juniors were promoted. This decision ensures the respondent benefits from the upgraded ACRs, with all consequential benefits, despite pending Supreme Court deliberations and Office Memorandum interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 11:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1246 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457116</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a review DPC must be convened to reconsider the respondent&#039;s promotion retrospectively from when his juniors were promoted. This decision ensures the respondent benefits from the upgraded ACRs, with all consequential benefits, despite pending Supreme Court deliberations and Office Memorandum interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>