<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1231 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457115</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, affirming the HC&#039;s decision that G.O. Ms No. 54&#039;s retrospective seniority was unconstitutional. It ruled that service weightage can only be used for promotion eligibility, not for altering seniority retrospectively. The judgment establishes that retrospective seniority must comply with constitutional standards, ensuring fairness and not adversely impacting other employees&#039; rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 11:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1231 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457115</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, affirming the HC&#039;s decision that G.O. Ms No. 54&#039;s retrospective seniority was unconstitutional. It ruled that service weightage can only be used for promotion eligibility, not for altering seniority retrospectively. The judgment establishes that retrospective seniority must comply with constitutional standards, ensuring fairness and not adversely impacting other employees&#039; rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>