<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 17 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38137</link>
    <description>Recovery of agricultural income-tax was held not to be barred by limitation because the original three-year period for commencing recovery had not expired before the amended recovery provision came into force. The amendment substituted the earlier provision and removed the limitation clause, so the unamended bar could no longer govern a demand that was still alive on the date of substitution. The recovery proceeding was therefore validly maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:33:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 17 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38137</link>
      <description>Recovery of agricultural income-tax was held not to be barred by limitation because the original three-year period for commencing recovery had not expired before the amended recovery provision came into force. The amendment substituted the earlier provision and removed the limitation clause, so the unamended bar could no longer govern a demand that was still alive on the date of substitution. The recovery proceeding was therefore validly maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>