<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 295 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758051</link>
    <description>MP HC held that substantial questions of law can be raised even at the last stage of adjudication, relying on SC precedent. Revenue raised questions of law not decided by ITAT due to lack of averment or arguments before the tribunal. Court remanded the appeal back to ITAT for fresh adjudication with directions to decide the matter afresh after providing hearing opportunity to parties and pass a reasoned order within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 15:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 295 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758051</link>
      <description>MP HC held that substantial questions of law can be raised even at the last stage of adjudication, relying on SC precedent. Revenue raised questions of law not decided by ITAT due to lack of averment or arguments before the tribunal. Court remanded the appeal back to ITAT for fresh adjudication with directions to decide the matter afresh after providing hearing opportunity to parties and pass a reasoned order within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>