<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758039</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding adhoc disallowance of expenses and cash deposits during demonetization. The court found that complete books of accounts, detailed expense records, and audited financials were properly produced. Lower authorities made general statements without pointing specific defects or invoking section 145(3) provisions. Regarding cash deposits, the entire cash book was produced establishing that deposits were properly explained by available cash balance, leaving no basis for additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758039</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding adhoc disallowance of expenses and cash deposits during demonetization. The court found that complete books of accounts, detailed expense records, and audited financials were properly produced. Lower authorities made general statements without pointing specific defects or invoking section 145(3) provisions. Regarding cash deposits, the entire cash book was produced establishing that deposits were properly explained by available cash balance, leaving no basis for additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>