<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer Eligible for Section 54F Deduction on Jointly Used Residential Property Despite Spouse&#039;s Sole Registration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81086</link>
    <description>Long-term capital gains deduction u/s 54F can be claimed for investment in a residential property not solely owned by the assessee. The assessing officer&#039;s sole objection that the land on which capital gains were utilized for construction is not in the assessee&#039;s name but her husband&#039;s name is invalid. A purposive interpretation favoring the deduction should be preferred over a literal construction. Section 54F is a beneficial provision and should be interpreted liberally in favor of the taxpayer. The deduction should not be denied on hyper-technical grounds. The term &#039;assessee&#039; must be given a wide interpretation to include legal heirs. Registration of the property in the assessee&#039;s name is not mandatory for claiming the deduction u/s 54. .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:21:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer Eligible for Section 54F Deduction on Jointly Used Residential Property Despite Spouse&#039;s Sole Registration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81086</link>
      <description>Long-term capital gains deduction u/s 54F can be claimed for investment in a residential property not solely owned by the assessee. The assessing officer&#039;s sole objection that the land on which capital gains were utilized for construction is not in the assessee&#039;s name but her husband&#039;s name is invalid. A purposive interpretation favoring the deduction should be preferred over a literal construction. Section 54F is a beneficial provision and should be interpreted liberally in favor of the taxpayer. The deduction should not be denied on hyper-technical grounds. The term &#039;assessee&#039; must be given a wide interpretation to include legal heirs. Registration of the property in the assessee&#039;s name is not mandatory for claiming the deduction u/s 54. .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:21:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>