<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 280 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758036</link>
    <description>Foreign tax credit could not be denied solely because Form 67 was not filed within the due date under Rule 128(9), as the filing requirement was treated as directory rather than mandatory. The Tribunal held that the technical objection to credit denial could not stand where Form 67 had been filed during rectification proceedings, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit was recognised in principle subject to factual verification by the assessing authority/CPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 280 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758036</link>
      <description>Foreign tax credit could not be denied solely because Form 67 was not filed within the due date under Rule 128(9), as the filing requirement was treated as directory rather than mandatory. The Tribunal held that the technical objection to credit denial could not stand where Form 67 had been filed during rectification proceedings, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit was recognised in principle subject to factual verification by the assessing authority/CPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>