<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 48 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38134</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act for a residential property gifted to the spouse. The court emphasized that even if the house is included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth, exemption should be allowed as if the property belongs to the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs, including advocate&#039;s fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 48 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38134</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act for a residential property gifted to the spouse. The court emphasized that even if the house is included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth, exemption should be allowed as if the property belongs to the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs, including advocate&#039;s fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>