https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758013 The Bombay HC dismissed the petitioner's case, citing their unclean hands due to lying and suppressing material facts before authorities and the court. The petitioner sought writs of Certiorari and Mandamus concerning drawback claims under the Customs Act, 1962. The court refused jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing honesty and transparency when approaching the judiciary. Consequently, the petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 5 lakhs in costs to the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, with interest and recovery provisions if unpaid within the specified timeframe. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:19:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758013 The Bombay HC dismissed the petitioner's case, citing their unclean hands due to lying and suppressing material facts before authorities and the court. The petitioner sought writs of Certiorari and Mandamus concerning drawback claims under the Customs Act, 1962. The court refused jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing honesty and transparency when approaching the judiciary. Consequently, the petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 5 lakhs in costs to the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, with interest and recovery provisions if unpaid within the specified timeframe. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758013