<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Orders Restoration of Struck-Off Company for Non-Compliance, Directs Actions for Late Payments and Violations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81063</link>
    <description>Statutory provisions regarding restoration of a company&#039;s name on the Register of Companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) u/s 252(1) and 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 were analyzed. An appeal u/s 252(1) can be filed by any aggrieved person if the company is dissolved by the ROC u/s 248(1), with a limitation period of 3 years. However, an application u/s 252(3) can only be filed by certain persons if the company&#039;s name is struck off u/s 248(2), with a longer limitation period of 20 years. In this case, the ROC struck off the company u/s 248(1)(d) for non-compliance with Section 10A(1) regarding filing a declaration of subscription within 180 days of incorporation. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the ROC to res.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:19:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:19:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Orders Restoration of Struck-Off Company for Non-Compliance, Directs Actions for Late Payments and Violations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81063</link>
      <description>Statutory provisions regarding restoration of a company&#039;s name on the Register of Companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) u/s 252(1) and 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 were analyzed. An appeal u/s 252(1) can be filed by any aggrieved person if the company is dissolved by the ROC u/s 248(1), with a limitation period of 3 years. However, an application u/s 252(3) can only be filed by certain persons if the company&#039;s name is struck off u/s 248(2), with a longer limitation period of 20 years. In this case, the ROC struck off the company u/s 248(1)(d) for non-compliance with Section 10A(1) regarding filing a declaration of subscription within 180 days of incorporation. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the ROC to res.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:19:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>