https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758007 NCLT Allahabad allowed appeal under Section 252(1) of Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of company name to Register of Companies. The company was struck off by ROC under Section 248(1)(d) for non-filing of subscription declaration within 180 days of incorporation as required under Section 10A. NCLT distinguished between appeals under Section 252(1) for companies dissolved under Section 248(1) with 3-year limitation versus applications under Section 252(3) for voluntary strike-offs under Section 248(2) with 20-year limitation. Company's name ordered restored to active status with direction to ROC to take further action regarding late subscription payment and other statutory violations. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2024 18:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758007 NCLT Allahabad allowed appeal under Section 252(1) of Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of company name to Register of Companies. The company was struck off by ROC under Section 248(1)(d) for non-filing of subscription declaration within 180 days of incorporation as required under Section 10A. NCLT distinguished between appeals under Section 252(1) for companies dissolved under Section 248(1) with 3-year limitation versus applications under Section 252(3) for voluntary strike-offs under Section 248(2) with 20-year limitation. Company's name ordered restored to active status with direction to ROC to take further action regarding late subscription payment and other statutory violations. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758007