https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758001 Delay in filing the appeals was condoned, allowing the matters to proceed. The Court then declined to entertain the appeals because the tax involved was below the monetary threshold fixed by the Board's Circular dated 06.08.2024 issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and dismissed the appeals accordingly. The pending interlocutory applications were disposed of, while the substantive question of law was left open for decision in an appropriate case. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:17:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758001 Delay in filing the appeals was condoned, allowing the matters to proceed. The Court then declined to entertain the appeals because the tax involved was below the monetary threshold fixed by the Board's Circular dated 06.08.2024 issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and dismissed the appeals accordingly. The pending interlocutory applications were disposed of, while the substantive question of law was left open for decision in an appropriate case. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758001