<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 243 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757999</link>
    <description>A hospital&#039;s retention from an in-house medical store for processing cashless mediclaim claims was treated as part of exempt healthcare services, not taxable commission under Business Auxiliary Service. The broad definitions of &quot;clinical establishment&quot; and &quot;health care service&quot; in Notification No. 25/2012-ST were applied to hold that medicines supplied to in-patients formed an integral component of treatment. The retained amount arose from settlement of mediclaim claims in the course of healthcare delivery, rather than from promoting the medical store&#039;s business. Applying the reasoning in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, the service tax demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 243 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757999</link>
      <description>A hospital&#039;s retention from an in-house medical store for processing cashless mediclaim claims was treated as part of exempt healthcare services, not taxable commission under Business Auxiliary Service. The broad definitions of &quot;clinical establishment&quot; and &quot;health care service&quot; in Notification No. 25/2012-ST were applied to hold that medicines supplied to in-patients formed an integral component of treatment. The retained amount arose from settlement of mediclaim claims in the course of healthcare delivery, rather than from promoting the medical store&#039;s business. Applying the reasoning in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, the service tax demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>