<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 242 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757998</link>
    <description>Software licence arrangements with Microsoft were examined to determine whether the appellant received taxable information technology software service under reverse charge. The record did not clearly show a sale to the appellant or transfer of the right to use software; invoices were in end customers&#039; names and the appellant appeared to act mainly as a reseller and payment facilitator. A FEMA compliance filing was not enough by itself to prove a taxable transfer. Because the adjudicating authority had not fully considered these core pleas, the demand and related issues on exemption, credit and short payment required fresh examination. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:18:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 242 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757998</link>
      <description>Software licence arrangements with Microsoft were examined to determine whether the appellant received taxable information technology software service under reverse charge. The record did not clearly show a sale to the appellant or transfer of the right to use software; invoices were in end customers&#039; names and the appellant appeared to act mainly as a reseller and payment facilitator. A FEMA compliance filing was not enough by itself to prove a taxable transfer. Because the adjudicating authority had not fully considered these core pleas, the demand and related issues on exemption, credit and short payment required fresh examination. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>