<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 240 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand and penalties imposed by the lower authorities. The Tribunal held that the Department cannot demand payment based on the value of exempted services when the Appellant had exercised the option to reverse proportionate credit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 240 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand and penalties imposed by the lower authorities. The Tribunal held that the Department cannot demand payment based on the value of exempted services when the Appellant had exercised the option to reverse proportionate credit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>