<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1535 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457093</link>
    <description>The ITAT Indore addressed cross appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 and 2011-12. For A.Y. 2012-13, it admitted additional evidence regarding undisclosed commission income and remitted the issue to the AO for reconsideration. For A.Y. 2011-12, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1535 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457093</link>
      <description>The ITAT Indore addressed cross appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 and 2011-12. For A.Y. 2012-13, it admitted additional evidence regarding undisclosed commission income and remitted the issue to the AO for reconsideration. For A.Y. 2011-12, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>