<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1511 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457104</link>
    <description>The HC rejected the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act involving commercial quantity of contraband ganja. The petitioner was an occupant of a vehicle allegedly transporting contraband. The court held that despite the right to speedy trial under Article 21, detention for two-three years in serious cases may not constitute undue delay. The petitioner failed to satisfy the twin conditions under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act, as the court could not record satisfaction that reasonable grounds existed for believing the accused was not guilty and unlikely to commit offences while on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1511 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457104</link>
      <description>The HC rejected the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act involving commercial quantity of contraband ganja. The petitioner was an occupant of a vehicle allegedly transporting contraband. The court held that despite the right to speedy trial under Article 21, detention for two-three years in serious cases may not constitute undue delay. The petitioner failed to satisfy the twin conditions under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act, as the court could not record satisfaction that reasonable grounds existed for believing the accused was not guilty and unlikely to commit offences while on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>