<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 38 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38124</link>
    <description>A partnership firm was held entitled to registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 because the Tribunal found the partnership deed and amendment deed created a valid and genuine partnership in conformity with the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. With no legal bar to formation established, registration could not be refused merely because it might reduce revenue collection. The question was therefore answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee-firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 38 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38124</link>
      <description>A partnership firm was held entitled to registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 because the Tribunal found the partnership deed and amendment deed created a valid and genuine partnership in conformity with the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. With no legal bar to formation established, registration could not be refused merely because it might reduce revenue collection. The question was therefore answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee-firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>