<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 230 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757986</link>
    <description>The assessment order was challenged on the ground that the authority had not considered the petitioner&#039;s reply and objections. The matter was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to appear before the authority, file additional representations and documents, and seek reconsideration of the assessment after being heard. The operative effect was a remand-like opportunity for fresh consideration of the assessment after compliance with the hearing requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 230 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757986</link>
      <description>The assessment order was challenged on the ground that the authority had not considered the petitioner&#039;s reply and objections. The matter was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to appear before the authority, file additional representations and documents, and seek reconsideration of the assessment after being heard. The operative effect was a remand-like opportunity for fresh consideration of the assessment after compliance with the hearing requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>