<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 225 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757981</link>
    <description>Penalty under the GST regime was set aside where the assessee claimed prior payment of tax and interest, disputed any fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, and complained of denial of a reasonable hearing. The HC held that the matter required fresh consideration on the existing factual dispute and remitted it to the assessing authority for re-adjudication after affording an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 225 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757981</link>
      <description>Penalty under the GST regime was set aside where the assessee claimed prior payment of tax and interest, disputed any fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, and complained of denial of a reasonable hearing. The HC held that the matter required fresh consideration on the existing factual dispute and remitted it to the assessing authority for re-adjudication after affording an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>