<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Reopening of Tax Assessment Invalid; No New Evidence Found for Change from Capital Gains to Business Income.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81046</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening an assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, the distinction between &quot;change of opinion&quot; and &quot;reasons to believe,&quot; and the classification of income as capital gains or business income. The assessee&#039;s investment source and short-term capital gains remained unexplained. The court held that the revenue failed to produce new information or documentary evidence for reopening the case, and a mere change of opinion by a new assessing officer cannot justify reassessment. The assessing officer changed the grounds for reassessment from treating the income as short-term capital gains to &quot;adventure in the nature of business,&quot; which the court deemed a colorable exercise of power. The court found that the land sale did not constitut.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:51:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Reopening of Tax Assessment Invalid; No New Evidence Found for Change from Capital Gains to Business Income.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81046</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening an assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, the distinction between &quot;change of opinion&quot; and &quot;reasons to believe,&quot; and the classification of income as capital gains or business income. The assessee&#039;s investment source and short-term capital gains remained unexplained. The court held that the revenue failed to produce new information or documentary evidence for reopening the case, and a mere change of opinion by a new assessing officer cannot justify reassessment. The assessing officer changed the grounds for reassessment from treating the income as short-term capital gains to &quot;adventure in the nature of business,&quot; which the court deemed a colorable exercise of power. The court found that the land sale did not constitut.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:51:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>