<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 211 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act for underreporting of income. It concluded that the disallowance was based on estimation due to missing vouchers, which were not deliberately withheld. The Tribunal found the explanation bona fide and directed the penalty to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 211 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act for underreporting of income. It concluded that the disallowance was based on estimation due to missing vouchers, which were not deliberately withheld. The Tribunal found the explanation bona fide and directed the penalty to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>