<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 187 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757943</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata upheld classification of imported petroleum products under Chapter Heading 2710 1990 as &quot;Other&quot; rather than 2710 1290 as &quot;Light oils and preparations&quot; claimed by Revenue. The tribunal found CRCL Kolkata&#039;s test report more reliable than Delhi&#039;s report based on 12-month-old samples, determining goods didn&#039;t meet light oil criteria. The order allowing home consumption instead of re-export was sustained. No penalty was imposed as procedural violations under Petroleum Act 2002 were rectified and goods weren&#039;t prohibited. Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected; importer&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 187 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757943</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata upheld classification of imported petroleum products under Chapter Heading 2710 1990 as &quot;Other&quot; rather than 2710 1290 as &quot;Light oils and preparations&quot; claimed by Revenue. The tribunal found CRCL Kolkata&#039;s test report more reliable than Delhi&#039;s report based on 12-month-old samples, determining goods didn&#039;t meet light oil criteria. The order allowing home consumption instead of re-export was sustained. No penalty was imposed as procedural violations under Petroleum Act 2002 were rectified and goods weren&#039;t prohibited. Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected; importer&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>