https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457086 A third bail application in an NDPS prosecution involving commercial quantity was considered under the restrictive conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Earlier bail requests had already been rejected on merits, and no material change in circumstances was shown despite examination of two panch witnesses; the investigating officer was still to be examined. The allegation that the applicant had destroyed evidence also weighed against release. Bail was refused, with the Court declining to interfere with custody in the pending prosecution. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:05:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457086 A third bail application in an NDPS prosecution involving commercial quantity was considered under the restrictive conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Earlier bail requests had already been rejected on merits, and no material change in circumstances was shown despite examination of two panch witnesses; the investigating officer was still to be examined. The allegation that the applicant had destroyed evidence also weighed against release. Bail was refused, with the Court declining to interfere with custody in the pending prosecution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457086