https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457087 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to patent errors apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new and important matter, or other grounds of a like nature. It cannot be invoked to reopen the merits, reargue concluded issues, or seek a fresh view merely because another interpretation is possible. An alleged error requiring detailed reasoning, or a challenge directed only to the correctness of the earlier decision, lies outside review. The petition sought reconsideration rather than disclosure of any manifest error, so no case for review was made out and dismissal followed. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:05:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457087 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to patent errors apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new and important matter, or other grounds of a like nature. It cannot be invoked to reopen the merits, reargue concluded issues, or seek a fresh view merely because another interpretation is possible. An alleged error requiring detailed reasoning, or a challenge directed only to the correctness of the earlier decision, lies outside review. The petition sought reconsideration rather than disclosure of any manifest error, so no case for review was made out and dismissal followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457087