<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1460 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457066</link>
    <description>ITAT Patna dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of capital gains addition on sale of vehicles and flat by charitable trust. The assets purchased in 2008 formed part of block assets under pre-2015 provisions, and AO failed to properly apply the relevant scheme. Regarding properties allegedly used for non-educational purposes, AO made additions without establishing factual use by specified persons under section 13(2)/(3). No investigation was conducted to prove misuse by associated persons. CBDT Circular clarified that property acquisition isn&#039;t inherently disallowed for charitable institutions unless actually misused by excluded persons at concessional rates. AO&#039;s additions lacked proper understanding of statutory provisions and factual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:04:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1460 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457066</link>
      <description>ITAT Patna dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of capital gains addition on sale of vehicles and flat by charitable trust. The assets purchased in 2008 formed part of block assets under pre-2015 provisions, and AO failed to properly apply the relevant scheme. Regarding properties allegedly used for non-educational purposes, AO made additions without establishing factual use by specified persons under section 13(2)/(3). No investigation was conducted to prove misuse by associated persons. CBDT Circular clarified that property acquisition isn&#039;t inherently disallowed for charitable institutions unless actually misused by excluded persons at concessional rates. AO&#039;s additions lacked proper understanding of statutory provisions and factual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>