<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1518 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457068</link>
    <description>The ITAT Panaji held that an appellate order communicated without quoting the required Document Identification Number (DIN) in violation of CBDT Circular was invalid. The Revenue failed to establish that the case fell within exceptional circumstances or provide evidence for regularization of manual communication. The court declared the impugned order as non-est, having no legal effect. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed without examining merits due to this procedural non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:04:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1518 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457068</link>
      <description>The ITAT Panaji held that an appellate order communicated without quoting the required Document Identification Number (DIN) in violation of CBDT Circular was invalid. The Revenue failed to establish that the case fell within exceptional circumstances or provide evidence for regularization of manual communication. The court declared the impugned order as non-est, having no legal effect. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed without examining merits due to this procedural non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>