https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457074 HC dismissed criminal revision petition in dishonour of cheque case. Revisionist failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. Court found cheque was duly signed by revisionist in sound mind as major, establishing liability for antecedent debt. No oral or documentary evidence was adduced to counter legal presumption favoring cheque holder. Trial court and appellate court judgments were upheld as proper appreciation of evidence rather than perverse findings. en-us Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:04:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457074 HC dismissed criminal revision petition in dishonour of cheque case. Revisionist failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. Court found cheque was duly signed by revisionist in sound mind as major, establishing liability for antecedent debt. No oral or documentary evidence was adduced to counter legal presumption favoring cheque holder. Trial court and appellate court judgments were upheld as proper appreciation of evidence rather than perverse findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457074