https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457075 The HC dismissed a review petition challenging an order regarding unauthorized construction. The court held that review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not substituting judicial views. Once judgment is rendered, the court becomes functus officio and cannot alter rights previously declared. Review cannot function as disguised appeal or entertain arguments on case merits. Even erroneous decisions cannot justify review without apparent errors on the record's face. Finding no such errors, the court dismissed the petition, emphasizing review's narrow scope in ensuring justice without disturbing judgment finality. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:04:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457075 The HC dismissed a review petition challenging an order regarding unauthorized construction. The court held that review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not substituting judicial views. Once judgment is rendered, the court becomes functus officio and cannot alter rights previously declared. Review cannot function as disguised appeal or entertain arguments on case merits. Even erroneous decisions cannot justify review without apparent errors on the record's face. Finding no such errors, the court dismissed the petition, emphasizing review's narrow scope in ensuring justice without disturbing judgment finality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457075