<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1545 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457078</link>
    <description>IGST refund denial based on an alleged erroneous punching of the duty drawback percentage was not finally upheld, and the refund application was directed to be reconsidered by the designated officer. The petitioners were to be heard in the fresh consideration, and the decision was to be placed on record before the next date, with all contentions kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1545 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457078</link>
      <description>IGST refund denial based on an alleged erroneous punching of the duty drawback percentage was not finally upheld, and the refund application was directed to be reconsidered by the designated officer. The petitioners were to be heard in the fresh consideration, and the decision was to be placed on record before the next date, with all contentions kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>