<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38105</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the expenditure incurred on the director&#039;s daughter&#039;s foreign education as a deduction in determining the company&#039;s business profits for the assessment year 1961-62. The court emphasized the daughter&#039;s qualifications and her subsequent contribution to the company, finding the expenditure proper and beneficial despite the absence of a commitment for her service post-training. The court considered the close relationship between the directors and the daughter as assurance that the training would benefit the company, rejecting the Income-tax Officer&#039;s reasoning for disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38105</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the expenditure incurred on the director&#039;s daughter&#039;s foreign education as a deduction in determining the company&#039;s business profits for the assessment year 1961-62. The court emphasized the daughter&#039;s qualifications and her subsequent contribution to the company, finding the expenditure proper and beneficial despite the absence of a commitment for her service post-training. The court considered the close relationship between the directors and the daughter as assurance that the training would benefit the company, rejecting the Income-tax Officer&#039;s reasoning for disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>