<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 159 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757915</link>
    <description>HC resolved a tax credit dispute involving a works contract service company. The court partially upheld the rejection of input tax credit transition, modified previous orders, and allowed the company to seek TDS refund. While maintaining penalties, the court set aside tax and interest demands, ensuring a balanced approach to resolving the tax credit utilization issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 159 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757915</link>
      <description>HC resolved a tax credit dispute involving a works contract service company. The court partially upheld the rejection of input tax credit transition, modified previous orders, and allowed the company to seek TDS refund. While maintaining penalties, the court set aside tax and interest demands, ensuring a balanced approach to resolving the tax credit utilization issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>