<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax department&#039;s failure to follow due process u/s 144C renders final assessment order invalid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81010</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to frame a draft assessment order and directly passing a final order was violative of the mandatory provisions of Section 144C, rendering the final order a nullity. The court emphasized that it was imperative for the Assessing Officer to frame an order in draft before issuing the final assessment order. Regarding the limitation period u/s 153, the court clarified that it cannot enlarge or expand the statutorily prescribed period for completing the assessment. The court found it unnecessary to examine additional challenges raised against the final assessment orders since the assessment period had expired. Consequently, the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:20:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax department&#039;s failure to follow due process u/s 144C renders final assessment order invalid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81010</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to frame a draft assessment order and directly passing a final order was violative of the mandatory provisions of Section 144C, rendering the final order a nullity. The court emphasized that it was imperative for the Assessing Officer to frame an order in draft before issuing the final assessment order. Regarding the limitation period u/s 153, the court clarified that it cannot enlarge or expand the statutorily prescribed period for completing the assessment. The court found it unnecessary to examine additional challenges raised against the final assessment orders since the assessment period had expired. Consequently, the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:20:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>