<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757913</link>
    <description>HC held that the AO&#039;s failure to first issue a draft assessment order under Section 144C, and instead directly passing a final assessment order, violated the mandatory procedure and rendered the assessment a nullity. The Court reaffirmed that Section 144C is obligatory where applicable, and non-compliance invalidates the assessment. Further, HC rejected the revenue&#039;s plea to effectively extend the statutory limitation under Section 153, holding that courts cannot enlarge legislatively prescribed time limits absent express statutory authority or an applicable exclusion provision. As no interim order had restrained the AO from completing the assessment, the limitation had expired. The writ petitions were allowed and the assessments quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757913</link>
      <description>HC held that the AO&#039;s failure to first issue a draft assessment order under Section 144C, and instead directly passing a final assessment order, violated the mandatory procedure and rendered the assessment a nullity. The Court reaffirmed that Section 144C is obligatory where applicable, and non-compliance invalidates the assessment. Further, HC rejected the revenue&#039;s plea to effectively extend the statutory limitation under Section 153, holding that courts cannot enlarge legislatively prescribed time limits absent express statutory authority or an applicable exclusion provision. As no interim order had restrained the AO from completing the assessment, the limitation had expired. The writ petitions were allowed and the assessments quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>