<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 136 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757892</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai held that foreign remittances credited to NRE account were adequately explained by the assessee. The assessee demonstrated sufficient income earned abroad, which was brought to India through NRE account, with part used for gifts to brothers. The tribunal found the source of credits properly explained, rejecting the revenue&#039;s addition under section 68. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition was confirmed, deciding in favor of the assessee for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 136 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757892</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai held that foreign remittances credited to NRE account were adequately explained by the assessee. The assessee demonstrated sufficient income earned abroad, which was brought to India through NRE account, with part used for gifts to brothers. The tribunal found the source of credits properly explained, rejecting the revenue&#039;s addition under section 68. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition was confirmed, deciding in favor of the assessee for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>