<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 125 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757881</link>
    <description>Imported calcite powder classification turned on whether the goods met the technical parameters for CTH 28365000 as calcium carbonate or remained classifiable under CTH 25369030 as declared. The Customs Laboratory report, which merely identified the goods as calcium carbonate, was not sufficient to support reclassification because it did not establish the tariff entry&#039;s essential characteristics, and the relevant laboratory was not equipped at the material time to test calcite powder. Since particle size, oil absorption ratio, and conformity with the applicable Indian standards were not satisfactorily proved, the declared classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 125 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757881</link>
      <description>Imported calcite powder classification turned on whether the goods met the technical parameters for CTH 28365000 as calcium carbonate or remained classifiable under CTH 25369030 as declared. The Customs Laboratory report, which merely identified the goods as calcium carbonate, was not sufficient to support reclassification because it did not establish the tariff entry&#039;s essential characteristics, and the relevant laboratory was not equipped at the material time to test calcite powder. Since particle size, oil absorption ratio, and conformity with the applicable Indian standards were not satisfactorily proved, the declared classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>